![]() |
Derby City Liberal Democrats Campaigning with Lucy Care for Derby all Year Round |
![]() |
| Derby City Liberal Democrats | <info@derbycitylibdems.org.uk> | 8th September 2010 |
Decision time for threatened Derby Post Office12.00.00am GMT Tue 5th Feb 2008
The consultation on the future of a Derby Post Office threatened with closure has ended. The final submissions from people wanting to save the Nottingham Road Post Office in Chaddesden had to be in on February 4th. One submission was sent in jointly by Liberal Democrat Parliamentary campaigner Lucy Care and local campaigner Eric Ashburner. Eric Ashburner said "We have sent in hundreds of signatures that we collected from people in Chaddesden. "I hope that Post Office Ltd will take into account the huge support for keeping the Nottingham Road Post Office. It should be absolutely clear to Post Office Ltd that this Post Office needs to be kept." Cllr Lucy Care said "The Nottingham Road Post Office is in a really convenient position in the middle of Chaddesden village, opposite Chadd Lane End. "It would be crazy for Post Office Ltd to close it." Derby Council was also sending in a submission to Post Office Ltd on the 4th of February. This followed the council passing a motion submitted by Cllr Lucy Care calling for the Council to write in support of keeping the Post Office open.
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Wed 12th Mar 2008: Brown Presented with Derby Post Office Petitions. Fri 23rd Nov 2007: Liberal Democrat bid to save Derby's Post Offices wins support. Fri 26th Oct 2007: Petition launched to save threatened Post Offices. Tue 2nd Oct 2007: Campaigner demands an end to the closure of Derby's Post Offices. Wed 1st Mar 2006: A Liberal Democrat alternative for Derby: Time for Energy Efficiency at the council. A Liberal Democrat Alternative for Derby: Time for bus station improvements. Published and promoted by Derby City Liberal Democrats (Philip Smith), Unit 1 Great Northern Court, 24A Great Northern Road, Derby, DE1 1LR The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |